« June 28, 2009 - July 4, 2009 | Main | July 12, 2009 - July 18, 2009 »
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 09:21 AM in American's fight for America! | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Is theris the "change" you want? Are you proud America?
WASHINGTON — Supporters of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor are quietly targeting the Connecticut firefighter who's at the center of Sotomayor's most controversial ruling.
On the eve of Sotomayor's Senate confirmation hearing, her advocates have been urging journalists to scrutinize what one called the "troubled and litigious work history" of firefighter Frank Ricci.
This is opposition research: a constant shadow on Capitol Hill.
"The whole business of getting Supreme Court nominees through the process has become bloodsport," said Gary Rose, a government and politics professor at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Conn.
On Friday, citing in an e-mail "Frank Ricci's troubled and litigious work history," the liberal advocacy group People for the American Way drew reporters' attention to Ricci's past. Other advocates for Sotomayor have discreetly urged journalists to pursue similar story lines. MORE>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 09:07 AM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Democrat Al Franken's emergence as the victor of the marathon Minnesota election battle triggered growing complaints from those who blame former Sen. Norm Coleman's defeat on the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now (ACORN).
Matthew Vadum, senior editor for the Capital Research Center think tank, stops just short of saying ACORN grabbed the election away from Coleman, although he doesn't rule out that possibility.
He points out that ACORN registers voters who are expected to vote Democratic in overwhelming numbers, based on demographics. In the year leading up to the election, ACORN tallied 43,000 new registrations in Minnesota. That probably was a decisive factor in a contest decided by 312 votes out of nearly 3 million ballots cast. MORE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ALSO:
ACORN’s “Muscle for Money” does the bidding of SEIU-7/7 San Francisco Examiner, by Kevin Mooney — Corporate and political officials who defy workplace and community organizers risk being made objects of scorn by bright red-clad protestors in public and private, courtesy of an activist union and its close allies in the nation’s most controversial liberal non-profit advocacy group.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 09:03 AM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The signing ceremony in Moscow was a grand affair. For Barack Obama, foreign policy neophyte and "reset" man, the arms reduction agreement had a Kissingerian air. A fine feather in his cap. And our president likes his plumage. Unfortunately for the United States, the country Obama represents, the prospective treaty is useless at best, detrimental at worst. Useless because the level of offensive nuclear weaponry, the subject of the U.S.-Russia "Joint Understanding," is an irrelevance. We could today terminate all such negotiations, invite the Russians to build as many warheads as they want, and profitably watch them spend themselves into penury, as did their Soviet predecessors, stockpiling weapons that do nothing more than, as Churchill put it, make the rubble bounce. Obama says that his START will be a great boon, setting an example to enable us to better pressure North Korea and Iran to give up their nuclear programs. That a man of Obama's intelligence can believe such nonsense is beyond comprehension. There is not a shred of evidence that cuts by the great powers -- the INF treaty, START I, the Treaty of Moscow (2002) -- induced the curtailment of anyone's programs. Moammar Gaddafi gave up his nukes the week we pulled Saddam Hussein out of his spider hole. No treaty involved. The very notion that Kim Jong Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will suddenly abjure nukes because of yet another U.S.-Russian treaty is comical. The pursuit of such an offensive weapons treaty could nonetheless be detrimental to us. Why? Because Obama's hunger for a diplomatic success, such as it is, allowed the Russians to exact a price: linkage between offensive and defensive nuclear weapons. This is important for Russia because of the huge American technological advantage in defensive weaponry. We can reliably shoot down an intercontinental ballistic missile. They cannot. And since defensive weaponry will be the decisive strategic factor of the 21st century, Russia has striven mightily for a quarter-century to halt its development. Gorbachev tried to swindle Reagan out of the Strategic Defense Initiative at Reykjavik in 1986. Reagan refused. As did his successors -- Bush I, Clinton, Bush II. Obama, who seeks to banish nuclear weapons entirely, has little use for such prosaic contrivances. First, the Obama budget actually cuts spending on missile defense, at a time when federal spending is a riot of extravagance and trillion-dollar deficits. Then comes the "pause" (as Russia's president appreciatively noted) in the planned establishment of a missile shield in Eastern Europe. And now the "Joint Understanding" commits us to a new treaty that includes "a provision on the interrelationship of strategic offensive and strategic defensive arms." Obama further said that the East European missile shield "will be the subject of extensive negotiations" between the United States and Russia. Obama doesn't even seem to understand the ramifications of this concession. Poland and the Czech Republic thought they were regaining their independence when they joined NATO under the protection of the United States. They now see that the shield negotiated with us and subsequently ratified by all of NATO is in limbo. Russia and America will first have to "come to terms" on the issue, explained President Dmitry Medvedev. This is precisely the kind of compromised sovereignty that Russia wants to impose on its ex-Soviet colonies -- and that U.S. presidents of both parties for the last 20 years have resisted. ...READ MORE>>>>Plumage - But At a Price TownHall, by Charles Krauthammer--
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 09:01 AM in END TIMES/Wars and Rumors of Wars | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
An African news site and an MSNBC broadcaster have delivered new references to President Obama's birthplace as being outside of the United States, even as a controversy has developed over a letter purporting to be from the president claiming Kapi'olani hospital in Honolulu as his birth location.
Network correspondent Mara Schiavocampo was reporting on the celebratory atmosphere in Accra, Ghana, immediately prior to Obama's visit to the west African nation today.
Interviewing a person who appeared to be a shop operator, she suggested, "Barack Obama is Kenyan … but Ghanaians are still proud of him."
Posted by Bob Barney on July 11, 2009 at 08:58 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Obama Diplomacy- Just surrender
TEL AVIV – Hamas does not need to recognize Israel's existence as a precondition for joining a Palestinian unity government, a top member of the Palestinian Authority's negotiating team told WND.
"We are not demanding Hamas recognize the state of Israel. It's not even part of the talks. Even we as the Fatah movement didn't recognize the state of Israel," said the PA negotiator, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The negotiator is leading efforts to forge a unity government between Hamas and PA President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party. The two have been at odds since Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip from Fatah in the summer of 2007. The unity efforts could result in new Palestinian elections as early as January and would bring Hamas into the U.S.-backed and funded PA.
Fatah is considered moderate by Israeli and U.S. policy. However, contrary to popular perception, Fatah has never officially recognized Israel as a Jewish state or even as a country with the right to exist.
In 1994, the Palestine Liberation Organization, or PLO, signed what was known as the "recognition principals" in which it formally agreed to recognize Israel. Fatah is the largest faction of the PLO, and as such, is thought to be party to the recognition agreement. MORE>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 10, 2009 at 08:08 AM in END TIMES/Wars and Rumors of Wars | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
JERUSALEM, July 9 (Reuters) - Israel must have "tremendously powerful"
weapons to deter a nuclear attack or destroy an enemy that dares to
launch an atomic strike, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu was quoted on Thursday as saying. National security
adviser Uzi Arad, in comments to Haaretz newspaper, appeared to allude
to what is widely believed to be Israel's own nuclear arsenal and a
standing policy of "mutually assured destruction" (MAD). He warned
other countries they could bring about their own devastation if they
launched an attack. Israel has never confirmed it has atomic arms.
In excerpts on Haaretz's English-language website of an interview to be published on Friday, Arad said he feared that if Iran became a nuclear power, five or six other states in the Middle East would follow suit. He called such a prospect a "nightmare" for Israel.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 10, 2009 at 08:05 AM in END TIMES/Wars and Rumors of Wars | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
WHEELING - He is not yet back to work in the Senate chamber, but U.S. Sen. Robert Byrd is opposing "cap and trade" legislation pushed by the Obama administration.
The 91-year-old Byrd, D-W.Va., was released from an unidentified Washington, D.C. hospital last week after a month-long stay for a staph infection. He expects to return to the chamber before the Senate begins debate on "cap and trade" - which is tentatively set for this fall, according to Byrd's office.
"I cannot support the House bill in its present form," Byrd said in a statement. "I continue to believe that clean coal can be a 'green' energy. Those of us who understand coal's great potential in our quest for energy independence must continue to work diligently in shaping a climate bill that will ensure access to affordable energy for West Virginians. I remain bullish about the future of coal, and am so very proud of the miners who labor and toil in the coalfields of West Virginia."
Byrd grew up in the coalfields of Stotesbury, W.Va., in Raleigh County. Jesse Jacobs, spokesman for Byrd, said the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will begin marking up the "cap and trade" bill later this month, with floor debate scheduled for September or October.
"So it is our hope that yes, Sen. Byrd will be here to vote on the legislation," Jacobs continued. "His return will be determined by his doctors and family members."
"Cap and trade" legislation - also known as House Resolution 2454 - is intended to reduce carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants over the next 40 years. It establishes a program that allows pollution permits to be bought and sold. The measure narrowly passed the U.S. House on June 26 by a vote of 219-212.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 10, 2009 at 06:25 AM in Economy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Obama's and OUR VIETNAM! HELMAND PROVICE, Afghanistan — It's
the middle of the night at the east corner guard post of Fiddler's
Green, a Marine fire base in Afghanistan's Helmand Province, along the
border with Pakistan. Corporal Ryan Joseph Bernal is on perimeter security duty. Armed
with an M-4, night vision binoculars and an array of high-powered
automatic weaponry, the 22-year-old U.S. Marine and several others keep
watch for activity just outside the concertina wire, which conveys the
powerful message “DO NOT ENTER” in a universal language Marines,
civilians and the Taliban all understand. Behind
the sentries are the 3rd Battalion, 11th Marines, out of 29 Palms,
California. They are relatively safe, and mostly sleeping. As
the American military's summer offensive into Taliban territory gains
strength, the number of U.S. soldiers who have been wounded or killed
in action has increased. But just as disturbing for these Marines is a
new concern: the recent security breach in the area that led to the
kidnapping of an American soldier. MORE>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 10, 2009 at 06:23 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
TEHRAN, Iran – Thousands of protesters streamed down avenues of the capital Thursday, chanting "death to the dictator" and defying security forces who fired tear gas and charged with batons, witnesses said.
Turning garbage bins into burning barricades and darting through choking clouds of tear gas, the opposition made its first foray into the streets in nearly two weeks in an attempt to revive mass demonstrations that were crushed in Iran's postelection turmoil. MORE>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 10, 2009 at 05:21 AM in The Middle East | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Joe Kovacs
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
In the ongoing quest to determine the exact birthplace of Barack
Obama, the president's alleged personal effort to put the matter to
rest is raising some interesting new questions.
The latest concerns focus on a letter purportedly sent by Obama to Honolulu's Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in which the commander in chief outright declares his birth at the facility.
![]() Barack Obama states in this letter on what appears to be White House stationery that he was born at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu. The letter was posted by the medical center on its website. |
In the message dated Jan. 24, the freshly inaugurated president is
said to explain that he's "a beneficiary of the excellence of
Kapi'olani Medical Center – the place of my birth ... ."
The
text of the letter was read aloud by U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie,
D-Hawaii, at the hospital's Centennial Dinner which took place on the
evening of Jan. 24, and was recorded on video posted online by Kapi'olani, as well as excerpted now on YouTube. MORE>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 09:59 PM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Pope Benedict today pinned responsibility for the worldwide
recession squarely on greed and an amoral fascination with
technological progress for its own sake.
This must be tackled, he said, by the creation of a global political authority and financial order based not just on the search for ever greater profits, but on ethics and a sense of the common good.
The pontiff made the appeal in a 144-page encyclical – a reflection on doctrine that is the highest form of papal writing – three days before he was due to discuss the global downturn with Barack Obama.
Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth) is Benedict's third encyclical and the first to deal exclusively with economic and social issues. In one section, he says the current economic crisis is "clear proof" of the "pernicious effects of sin".
The pope's analysis echoed some of the criticisms made by the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, of government policies that target growth to the exclusion of wider social considerations. But, as its title suggests, the papal encyclical is a primarily theological discourse which takes as its point of departure the argument that only a belief in the truth as proclaimed by Christianity can offer the necessary answers.
"A Christianity of charity without truth would be more or less interchangeable with a pool of good sentiments," Benedict writes. His reflection – delayed by more than a year by the world economic crisis – nevertheless contains numerous specific criticisms and recommendations. Though the pontiff does not use the word "capitalism" in the encyclical, there are lengthy reflections on morality in economics.
In a key passage, the encyclical says: "The conviction that the economy must be autonomous, that it must be shielded from 'influences' of a moral character, has led man to abuse the economic process in a thoroughly destructive way. In the long term, these convictions have led to economic, social and political systems that trample upon personal and social freedom, and are therefore unable to deliver the justice that they promise."
Then in an unequivocal critique of unbridled markets, the pope writes that "grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action, conceived as a means for pursuing justice through redistribution."
At a press conference in the Vatican, the pope's technical consultant, Stefano Zamagni, an economics professor at the University of Bologna, denied the encyclical was anti-capitalist, but added that it "views capitalism in its historical dimension and goes beyond it".
He noted that "the market economy is broader than just capitalism", which was merely one variant. In another section of the reflection, Benedict argues that "financiers must rediscover the genuinely ethical foundation of their activity … right intention, transparency, and the search for positive results are mutually compatible and must never be detached from one another."
Then, in a passage that builds on ideas first voiced by his predecessor, John Paul II, the pope argues that globalisation has made necessary a "reform of the United Nations Organisation and likewise of economic institutions and international finance so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth".
One of his most senior advisers, cardinal Renato Martino, said: "The encyclical is not asking for a super- or world government." But it comes very close to doing so. It proposes a "true world political authority" that "would need to be universally recognised and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice and respect for rights." It would be asked to "manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis [and] to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis."
But its responsibilities would be more than just economic. They would include securing "timely disarmament, food security and peace". The new body, a reformed UN, would also be called upon "to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration".
Often regarded as the first "green" pope, Benedict also took advantage of his encyclical to make clearer his ideas on the importance of respecting the environment. But Zamagni said the document implicitly rejected forms of environmental thinking that put other forms of creation on a par with humankind.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 11:22 AM in The Beast is Rising in Europe | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
China Riots Signal Democratic Deficit- IBD, Democracy: Riots exploded in China's western Xinjiang province this week, in what authorities alternatively call criminal acts or global terrorism. In reality, it's neither: it's the pent-up fury of people who live without freedom. ...
Congress digs into spending bills-7/8
AP, A House panel Tuesday night voted to require General Motors and
Chrysler to restore franchise agreements with their dealers despite
their dire financial condition. ...
SKorean Web sites hit by suspected cyber attack-
Thin-Looking Kim Jong Il Makes Rare Appearance-
Barack Obama holds a fire sale of America's nuclear defences in Moscow -Where in the Constitution can a President sign a treaty without 2/3 Senate approval. This move by Obama makes us a target for a first strike! This is treason!
OHIO: Black teens attack white family on 4th, shouting 'It's a black world'...
Health bill? Billions for parks, paths, farmers' markets...
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 08:16 AM in Today's Headlines | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
That aid — about $17 billion — is the first piece of the administration's massive stimulus package that can be tracked locally. Much of it has followed a well-worn path to places that regularly collect a bigger share of federal grants and contracts, guided by formulas that have been in place for decades and leave little room for manipulation.
"There's no politics at work when it comes to spending for the recovery," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says.
Counties that supported Obama last year have reaped twice as much money per person from the administration's $787 billion economic stimulus package as those that voted for his Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, a USA TODAY analysis of government disclosure and accounting records shows. That money includes aid to repair military bases, improve public housing and help students pay for college.
The reports show the 872 counties that supported Obama received about $69 per person, on average. The 2,234 that supported McCain received about $34.
Investigators who track the stimulus are skeptical that political considerations could be at work. The imbalance is so pronounced — and the aid so far from complete — that it would be almost inconceivable for it to be the result of political tinkering, says Adam Hughes, the director of federal fiscal policy for the non-profit OMB Watch. "Even if they wanted to, I don't think the administration has enough people in place yet to actually do that," he says.
"Most of what they're doing at this point is just stamping the checks and sending them out," Hughes says.
The stimulus package Obama signed in February includes about $499 billion in new spending, and to date, the Obama administration has allocated about $158 billion to specific projects and programs. Most of that money has gone directly to state governments, which then disperse the money to prevent school layoffs, repair roads and fund social services. That contrasts with the $17 billion that Washington distributes directly to local communities.
Including the larger chunk of money given to state governments, the aid favors states that voted for Obama, which have received about 20% more per person
Not all of the money favors places that supported Obama. About a third of the $17 billion, or $5.5 billion, in contracts that the federal government has signed for projects ranging from repaving runways to cleaning up nuclear waste has gone overwhelmingly to counties that supported McCain.
Jake Wiens, an investigator with the non-profit Project on Government Oversight, says it's too soon to draw meaningful conclusions about whether the type of aid in the stimulus favors Obama's constituents.
But, he says, "it will be important to pay close attention as the data come in to ensure that political favoritism plays no role."
The imbalance didn't start with the stimulus. From 2005 through 2007, the counties that later voted for Obama collected about 50% more government aid than those that supported McCain, according to spending reports from the U.S. Census Bureau. USA TODAY's review did not include Alaska, which does not report its election results by county. SOURCE.....
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 08:08 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A quarry from the late Second Temple Period that
produced stone to build the Temple Mount's supporting walls has been
uncovered in central Jerusalem, the Antiquities Authority said Monday. Workers at the ancient quarry in Jerusalem. The
latest discovery brought to three the number of quarries found in the
city over the past two years which archeologists believe were used in
the construction of the Temple walls.
The 2,030-year-old quarry, which spans more than one dunam (0.1
hectare), was discovered during a salvage excavation on the city's
Rehov Shmuel Hanevi ahead of planned construction of residential
buildings at the site, the Authority said.
The immense size of the stones found at the site, reaching a
height of 2 meters, indicate that they were used in the construction of
King Herod's magnificent projects in Jerusalem, including the Temple
Mount walls, said Dr. Ofer Sion, the director of the dig at the site. "We know from historical sources that in order to
build the Temple and other projects which Herod constructed, such as
his palace, hundreds of thousands of various size stones were required
- most of them weighing between two and five tons each," he said. "The
dimensions of the stones that were produced in the quarry that was
revealed are suitable for the Temple walls."
Sion added that the quarry that was exposed was actually a
small part of a large series of quarries that was spread across the
entire slope, from Musrara to the Sanhedria neighborhood. MORE>>>>>>>
Photo: Assaf Peretz, courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 08:04 AM in Religion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
As we reported in the wee hours of the morning today, Scott Rasmussen, respected long-time pollster, reported one hour ago that Barack Obama has dropped a full percentage point in his approval rating in just 24-hours. The poll shows that Americans are beginning to register their discontent with Obama, and that they now consider the economy to be fully his and not that of George W. Bush.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 32% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack
Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-seven percent (37%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of –5.The number who strongly disapprove inched up another point to the highest level measured to date and the overall Approval Index is at the lowest level yet for Obama (see trends).
As the numbers above confirm, the President continues on a downward spiral in public approval. Those who strongly disapprove of Obama's job performance now outnumber those who strongly approve by 5 percentage points.
And, as Rasmussen notes, Obama's overall approval rating, combining those who strongly approve with those who 'somewhat' approve, is now below the number of those who voted for him in November:
Overall, 52% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance so far. Yesterday and today are the first time that the number of voters who approve of the President’s performance has slipped below the 53% share of the vote he won last November. Forty-eight percent (48%) now disapprove. For other barometers of the President’s performance, see Obama By the Numbers or review recent demographic highlights from the tracking polls.
Democrats in Congress saw this coming. It is for this reason that they are considering yet another trillion-dollar 'stimulus' bill for the economy. A trillion for the 1st stimulus, a trillion for the 'healthcare reform' bill, and yet another trillion for a 2nd stimulus? MORE>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 07:59 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE!!!!! HOW MUCH MORE ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE AMERICA???
By Joe Kovacs
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
If you happened to read online news sites such as United Press
International or the popular hoax-busting Snopes.com anytime up until
Tuesday night, you would have seen definitive statements that President
Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii.
But checking back now, both sites are suddenly providing an entirely different location, the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children, also in the capital of the Aloha State.
Within hours of a WND report revealing Obama's birth being reported at two different Hawaiian hospitals, both sites changed their information to suddenly fall in line with the president's claim that he was born at Kapi'olani.
Here is the screen shot from Snopes on July 7, before WND's report was posted:MORE>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 07:34 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted: July 08, 2009
9:46 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
In an astonishing admission, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she was under the impression that legalizing abortion with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members of the populace, or as she put it "populations that we don't want to have too many of."
Her remarks, set to be published in the New York Times Magazine this Sunday but viewable online now, came in an in-depth interview with Emily Bazelon titled, "The Place of Women on the Court."
The 16-year veteran of the high court was asked if she were a lawyer again, what would she "want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda."
Ginsburg responded:
Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don't know why this hasn't been said more often.
Question: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae – in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn't really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong. MORE>>>>>>>>
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
IRS tells pro-lifers to give up 1st Amendment
Requires affirmation they will not 'protest'
--WND
Posted by Bob Barney on July 09, 2009 at 07:30 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This letter was written in November after President Obama won the election, becoming the first black to hold the office. Dr. Anne Wortham Ph.D. is an associate professor of sociology at Illinois State University. Read today by Neal Boortz on the radio.
Fellow Americans,
Please know: I am black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a black president to love the ideal of America .
I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America . Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to be wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 's Kennedy School of Government.
I would have to believe that "fairness" is the equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.
Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.
So you have made history, Americans.
You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the
president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The
battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won.
Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie
Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy
look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel
warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So,
toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s
bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee
Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have
elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black
man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do
Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon
Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom
and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good.
There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 10:31 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
SC killer should have been behind bars.... or more reasons why Sanford shouldn't be President.
Copyright laws threaten online freedom; Governments restrict right to communicate...
CRAIGSLIST robberies on the rise in Philadelphia...
PALIN: 'Obama is growing government outrageously and it's immoral'...
Just how naïve is President Obama?- American Thinker, by Richard Baehr-- Today, from the group Stratfor, comes this stunning offer to Iran from President Obama: "U.S. President Barack Obama said July 7 that if Iran stops its nuclear weapon development program, the U.S, has no reason to develop a missile defense system, Interfax reported. ...
The High Priest of the New Religion compares the fight against global warming to fighting Nazis
The Smart Loser- IBD, Leadership: Robert McNamara, architect of the failed U.S. Vietnam war strategy, cultivated a reputation as the smartest man in Washington. But the pride behind his high IQ cost America dearly. ...
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 08:45 AM in Today's Headlines | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Joe Kovacs and Jerome Corsi © 2009 WorldNetDaily
More than eight months after Barack Obama was elected president, the mystery surrounding his precise birthplace is deepening as the myth-busting website Snopes.com – along with several news agencies and an Obama community blog – directly contradict the president's own claim regarding the hospital in which he was born.
In an official letter signed by Obama on White House stationery, the president celebrates his birth at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii. The facility has posted that letter on its website, along with video of the letter being read in public. MORE>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 08:45 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
WASHINGTON - Last week, German authorities discovered that groups of
terrorists may have been dispatched from training bases in Pakistan to
launch crippling attacks.
In April, U.S. intelligence officials warned Germany about
possible terror attacks. Since that time German security officials have
reportedly been preparing for massive, multi-layered attacks for which
al-Qaida has become known.
Shortly after the April warning, German Ambassador Klaus
Scharioth said in an unrelated interview, "You will understand that I
can't go into the details of the terrorist threat, but I can only tell
you that we all know that we have to be vigilant and that we have to
continue to work very hard on that, but I do not want to go into
details." MORE>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 08:39 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Obama's 'Chickens, have come home.... to roost!'
NEW YORK, July 7 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell to their lowest level in 10 weeks on Tuesday as talk of a second government stimulus plan heightened fears that the economy is not yet on the path to recovery and that the corporate earnings season starting this week will be weak.
A member of the Obama administration's economic advisory panel said the United States should plan to possibly provide a second round of stimulus funds to prop up the economy. The comments come as investors question earlier optimism for a quick recovery, which had driven stocks as much as 40 percent higher since early March. For details, see MORE>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 08:27 AM in Economy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A widespread computer attack that began July 4 knocked out the Web sites of the Treasury Department, the Secret Service and other U.S. government agencies, according to officials inside and outside the government.
Sites in South Korea were also affected, and South Korean intelligence officials believe the attack was carried out by North Korean or pro-Pyongyang forces.
The U.S. government Web sites, which also included those of the Federal Trade Commission and the Transportation Department, were all down at varying points over the holiday weekend and into this week. South Korean Internet sites began experiencing problems Tuesday.
U.S. officials refused to publicly discuss details of the cyber attack. MORE>>>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 08:16 AM in END TIMES/Wars and Rumors of Wars | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
From one drug dealer to another - Call it professional courtesy...
A congressman from Michigan is grilling President Barack Obama about his open advocacy for the ousted president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, including whether the U.S. knew of Zelaya's alleged narcotics trafficking.
Zalaya was taken by members of the Honduras military from his home on June 28 and put on a plane to Costa Rica. They accused him of attempting to violate their own nation's constitutional limitation to one term for a president.
While President Obama has condemned the action as a "coup," the military quickly stood down and in place of Zalaya a member of his own political party was named by legislators to replace him.
Since then there have been arguments over Zalaya's actions, the military's response, and whether the result still is a democratic system.
Now Rep. Thaddeus McCotter has written to Obama, questioning the president's "personal, public demands" that Zelaya be returned to power in light of the accusations against him. MORE>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 08, 2009 at 05:23 AM in The Obama File | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Another Barney Frank Scandal..... Another crash coming.....
SAN FRANCISCO, July 7 (Reuters) - U.S. mortgage fraud reports jumped 36 percent last year as desperate homeowners and industry professionals tried to maintain their standard of living from the boom years, the FBI said on Tuesday.
Suspicious activity reports rose to 63,713 in fiscal year 2008, which ended last September, from 46,717 the year before. California and Florida, centers of the housing bust, had the highest numbers of suspicious reports as foreclosures jumped, the stock market dropped and credit dried up. MORE>>>>>>
Posted by Bob Barney on July 07, 2009 at 11:27 PM in Economy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
By Joshua Rhett MilleR
A day before New York Rep. Peter King called Michael Jackson a
“pervert” unworthy of nonstop media coverage, the aunt of a U.S.
soldier killed in Afghanistan on the same day Jackson died asked why
her nephew's death went virtually unnoticed while the King of Pop got
memorial shrines across the country. "Mr.
Jackson received days of wall-to-wall coverage in the media," Martha
Gillis wrote to the Washington Post. "Where was the coverage of my
nephew or the other soldiers who died that week?" Gillis'
nephew, Lt. Brian Bradshaw, 24, died in Kheyl, Afganistan, of wounds
suffered when an improvised explosive device detonated near his
vehicle. Bradshaw, of Steilacoom, Wash., was assigned to the 1st
Battalion, 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Airborne Brigade
Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division in Fort Richardson, Alaska. He was
one of at least 13 U.S. soldiers to die in Afghanistan since Jackson's
death on June 25. Bradshaw's mother, Mary,
said she agreed with Gillis, saying the nonstop coverage of Jackson's
death has become "totally ridiculous" and laughable. "I
can watch the news many nights and there's no mention of what's going
on in Afghanistan or Iraq and there's boys dying over there," Bradshaw
told FOXNews.com. "Oh God, I can't talk." Gillis,
of Springfield, Va., could not be reached for comment. In her letter to
the Washington Post, she described Bradshaw as a "thoroughly decent
person with a wry sense of humor" who loved history, particularly the
Civil War. "He had old-fashioned values
and believed that military service was patriotic and that actions
counted more than talk," Gillis wrote. "He wasn't much for talking,
although he could communicate volumes with a raised eyebrow." Bradshaw,
who graduated from Pacific Lutheran University, was the product of a
military family. His father, Paul, is a retired National Guard
helicopter pilot, and his mother is a retired Army nurse. Bradshaw was
buried Monday following a service at St. John's Bosco Church in
Lakewood, Wash. "He was a
search-and-rescue volunteer, an altar boy, a camp counselor," Gillis'
letter continued. "He carried the hopes and dreams of his parents
willingly on his shoulders. What more than that did Michael Jackson do
or represent that earned him memorial 'shrines,' while this soldier's
death goes unheralded?" Gillis
said the only media outlets that covered Bradshaw's death were in his
hometown of Steilacoom, Wash., and those where he was stationed before
his deployment in March. Gillis' sentiment
echoes that of King, the Long Island, N.Y., congressman who called on
society to stop "glorifying" Jackson in a YouTube video posted on Monday. King
said Jackson had been excessively praised in the days after his death
while society ignored the efforts of teachers, police officers and
veterans. In the two-minute video, King called the "day in and day out"
coverage of Jackson's death "too politically correct." "Let's
knock out the psychobabble," he said in the video, which was taped
outside an American Legion Hall in his district. "He was a pervert, a
child molester; he was a pedophile. And to be giving this much coverage
to him, day in and day out, what does it say about us as a country? I
just think we're too politically correct." King,
who is among the possible Republican contenders to run against
Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, acknowledged that Jackson "may have
been a good singer" and "did some dancing," but he blasted the King of
Pop as someone who could not be trusted around children. "There's
nothing good to say about this guy," King continued. "But the bottom
line is, would you let your child or grandchild be in the same room as
Michael Jackson?"
Posted by Bob Barney on July 07, 2009 at 02:37 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Every July 4, we retreat to fireworks, feast and festival in celebration of an independence that is rapidly becoming little more than a memory. Our ancestors declared their independence in 1776 from a tyrannical, overbearing government. The independence claimed by the authors of the U.S. Constitution helped them create a government expressly prohibited from becoming tyrannical and overbearing, by limiting its power to certain enumerated responsibilities. Those limitations have long been ignored, and the current government makes no apology for its overbearing tyranny.
Just as American independence was foreshadowed by a tea party in Boston, America's new independence is foreshadowed by tea parties across the nation. There is more evidence that a new declaration is being drafted. Currently, 36 states have approved or are considering some form of state sovereignty resolution. Several states are following Montana's example, enacting laws that defy federal intervention. More than a dozen states have enacted or are considering legislation that prohibits the federal government from imposing a mandatory National Animal Identification System. These are symptoms of a society that is dissatisfied with the long train of abuses government continues to inflict upon it.
As the modern-day freedom fighters begin to organize and strategize, the government chooses not to reform, but to entrench and expand its control over the people.
The similarity is remarkable, between the rise of the Democratic Socialist Party now in control of Washington and the rise of the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany in the 1930s.
Led by an articulate orator, the German government set out to nationalize health care, transportation, manufacturing and law enforcement. The Obama government has set out to nationalize manufacturing of autos and the finance industry. The Obama-backed "cap and trade" legislation will effectively nationalize the energy and transportation industries. And Obama's nationalized health care program is on the front burner.
Now here's another similarity: nationalization of law enforcement. H.R. 675, sponsored by Democrat Rep. Bob Filner, was introduced to:
Provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. (Emphasis added.)
Why do employees of the Department of Defense need the authority to execute warrants, make arrests and carry firearms? When the bill was introduced, Filner said: "We need to ensure that federal, state and local law enforcement are able to work together to apprehend criminals and to prevent and solve crimes."
The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act explicitly prohibits the Department of Defense from involvement in state and local law enforcement activities. The feds have the FBI to investigate federal crimes and the Justice Department to prosecute federal crimes. Waco and Ruby Ridge are good examples of federal law enforcement. And the land management agencies have gun-totin' enforcement officers to prevent tourists from picking up arrowheads on federal property. Why do we need to authorize the secretary of defense to arm another domestic police force?
Take a clue from the authorities granted by the bill:
There are other authorities, but let's focus on this last one: "To prevent breaches of the peace and suppress affrays or unlawful assemblies." What is an unlawful assembly? Any assembly that is not authorized by government is unlawful. Should an irate society decide to hold a tea party even if government refused to authorize it, then there must be a reliable federal law enforcement army to "suppress" the unlawful assembly. Local police cannot be trusted to "suppress" an assembly of their neighbors. MORE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 07, 2009 at 12:30 PM in American's fight for America! | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Jim Kouri
While the mainstream news media are beginning to cover the story of
rampant voter fraud perpetrated by liberal organizations such as ACORN,
don't expect reporters to provide anymore than a passing interest in
preventing illegal aliens -- or even legal immigrants -- from voting.
Posted by Bob Barney on July 07, 2009 at 08:41 AM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)





Recent Comments